Digital Privacy Advocate Hats

Digital privacy has a vocabulary of consent, metadata and threat models, but the community's cookie-banner frustration is unusually plain. One Reddit contributor describes page after page of instructions without a reject-all button; another says they close the tab out of spite. Those individual comments give REJECT ALL its recognizable voice. Here it becomes a compact embroidered declaration beside the DIGITAL PRIVACY and PRIVACY ADVOCATE badges. There is a concrete distinction behind the jokes. EFF's Privacy Badger documentation separates identifying tracking cookies from low-entropy functional cookies, rather than treating every cookie as surveillance. In December 2024, the FTC alleged that Mobilewalla sold sensitive location data without reasonable consent verification; the proposed settlement also restricted collecting advertising-auction data for purposes beyond participating in those auctions. That historical allegation gives the collection's data-product satire a specific backdrop. PERSONALIZATION: OFF / PERSONALITY: EXCESSIVE supplies the exuberant answer to an interface setting, while MY METADATA HAS A STUNT DOUBLE makes evasion a theatrical boast. THREAT MODEL: VIBES and UNTRACKABLY CHARMING stay personal jokes, without promising technical protection. The personality and terrible-data-product lines each come in two colorways, with the approved wording embroidered on dad hats.